From the daily archives: Thursday, July 16, 2009
2/10. Terrible. The film is a disaster on every level: a tedious, uninvolving and occassionally laughable plot is married to an unhappy mixture of the non-existent and the cliched characterisation, and then rounded off with dialogue of the utmost banality. Even the presence of a stellar cast (how were they persuaded to get involved?) cannot [...]
This follows up my previous post. Here we are going to calculation public domain numbers based directly on authorial birth/death date information rather than on guesstimated weightings. We’re going to focus on the Cambridge University Library (CUL) data we used previously.
Pub. DateTotalNo AuthorAny DateDeath Date 1870-1880505646634 (13%)23016 (45%)21876 (43%) 1880-1890668578225 (12%)31135 (46%)28570 (42%) [...]Categories
- *nix (9)
- Academic (73)
- Activity Updates (20)
- Books (55)
- Cinema (112)
- Code (15)
- Command Line (9)
- Copyright (23)
- Culture and Society (27)
- Data Digging (4)
- Economics (155)
- EUPD (10)
- External (3)
- Filesharing (11)
- Governance (14)
- Hacks (21)
- Happiness (16)
- Hardware (1)
- History (15)
- Innovation and Intellectual Property (66)
- Intellectual Myths (12)
- Javascript (3)
- Knowledge Systems (17)
- Miscellaneous (17)
- Musings (15)
- Notes (14)
- Open Bibliographic Data (2)
- Open Data (29)
- Open Knowledge Foundation (66)
- Openness (41)
- Own Work (59)
- Papers (4)
- People (1)
- Photos (1)
- Platforms (1)
- Poetry (1)
- Policy (18)
- PSI (8)
- Python (24)
- Quote (1)
- RDF (2)
- Shuttleworth Fellow (56)
- Software (47)
- Sysadmin (2)
- Talks (34)
- Transaction Costs (5)
- Work In Progress (2)


