The Evolution of Status and its Implications for Happiness and Well-being
Originally status would have developed from some kind of of stimulus-response setup:
Beating Competitor
|
V
Higher Status
|
V
Better Access to 'Resources'
(e.g. Food and Partners)
|
V
Higher Survival Rate /
More Progeny etc
|
V
Development of Reward System(s)
for these outcomes (Food etc)
|
| (short-circuiting
| as with e.g. sex)
|
V
Development of Reward Systems
for Success in Competition
(Higher Status)
So status now has two components:
- Increase in status improves access to ‘basic’ goods we derive direct ‘utility’ from (food etc)
- Increase in status provides direct ‘utility’ independent of any impact upon access ‘basic’ goods.
What about respect? It could be argued that respect is a ‘basic’ good directly equivalent to type (ii) status. However I’m not really convinced of this for two reasons. First, ‘respect’ is fundamentally different from ‘normal’ goods in that one can select what you respect (and whose respect you care about). Second, and more importantly, as just outlined above, the desire for ‘respect’ or ‘status’ seems to me a ‘secondary’ desire, which has come about via a short-circuiting of our basic reward systems for ‘primary/basic’ goods.
Leaving this aside, the crucial point is that type (ii) status results in a pure zero-sum game. Thus, reducing competition for it (perhaps by increasing compassion) might move us to a (more) positive sum situation. Furthermore, the clear distinction between type (i) and type (ii) allow us to separate out ‘competing to survive’ (which might be essential) and ‘competing (just) to win’. This seems an important distinction to make. After all, we can all accept that, in a whole set of situations, successfully competing may be crucial to obtaining the basic resources needed to survive. However as we get wealthier it would seem that this first aspect diminishes in importance and the second (less healthy) aspect of status looms ever larger.
One Response to The Evolution of Status and its Implications for Happiness and Well-being
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
-
Categories
- *nix
- Academic
- Activity Updates
- Books
- Cinema
- Code
- Command Line
- Copyright
- Culture and Society
- Data Digging
- Economics
- EUPD
- External
- Filesharing
- Governance
- Hacks
- Happiness
- Hardware
- History
- Innovation and Intellectual Property
- Intellectual Myths
- Javascript
- Knowledge Systems
- Miscellaneous
- Musings
- Notes
- Open Bibliographic Data
- Open Data
- Open Knowledge Foundation
- Openness
- Own Work
- Papers
- People
- Photos
- Platforms
- Poetry
- Policy
- PSI
- Python
- Quote
- RDF
- Shuttleworth Fellow
- Software
- Sysadmin
- Talks
- Transaction Costs
- Work In Progress
-
Articles
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- March 2004
- October 2003
-
Meta





Can you really ‘select’ whose respect you care about?