The Social Value of Access to the OED
I was pointed at this post about making a first edition of the OED freely available online. This is a wonderful idea but here I just wanted to talk about what the value of doing this would be.
In his email Kragen Sitaker guesstimates a social value of $293 billion for the project_[1]. While clearly done with his tongue firmly in his cheek I think such calculations are important enough to be worth debating and in this case think this amount is much too high for several reasons.
First and most important what is the value of gaining access to the OED. The figure of $295 per year for access he provides is for individual subscription. But the majority of people do not access the OED this way but rather through an institutional subscription. Thus this is not the average price of a user’s access but is the highest price point used by a price-discriminating monopolist. For an institution the price tag is probably in the thousands and this license covers all access by members (for example the recent edition of the Dictionary of National Biography costs around 3000 pounds per year at its most expensive). Given that most institutions have thousands or tens of thousands of members this puts the price per year at under half a pound (~$1) or even lower.
Secondly, if we wish to calculate the social value of access for the the whole world we cannot simply extrapolate the valuation of current users to every man, woman and child on the planet. Under basic demand theory, all things being equal, the current buyers are those with the highest willingness to pay for the good. The willingness to pay of the remaining consumers will be lower, and likely a lot, lot lower, than that of these original users. Picking a number out of thin air we might estimate that the total social value of all of the remaining potential users of the OED is approximately Y times the current level of sales where Y is less than 10.
Repeating the above calculations with these new figures yield:
30 million x $1 x (1/12) x Y x (1/0.1) =~ 3Y million
Setting Y to 1 yields around $30 million which is still a very large amount but a lot less than the $293 billion floating around in the original calculation.
[1] The original calculation
Here are some thoughts on monetary estimates of the value of this project.
Online access to the current edition costs US$295 per year and is currently available to about 30 million people, for a total value of $8.8 billion per year. [snip]
If we discount the $295 per year by a yearly factor of 1.1, which is extremely generous, we get a total of $3059 for the next 30 years. Adding it up to infinity, we get $3245. If we use a more reasonable (i.e. closer to unity) discount rate, we get a larger value.
Suppose we estimate the value of having access to the public-domain part of the OED by reference to the version that Oxford has for sale, discounted by: - a factor of 6 to account for the fact that the people who have bothered to buy access at $295 per year are those who are unusually devoted to words; - a factor of 3 to account for its incompleteness; - a factor of 2 to account of it being out-of-date; - a factor of 2 to account for getting page images instead of ASCII text.
This brings the total value of the public-domain portion down to $45 per person, or $4.09 per year per person. Approximately 99.55% of the world's population, or about 6.5 billion people, currently doesn't have access to the OED.
This values the public-domain version at $26.6 billion per year, or $293 billion overall. (If you pick a lower discount rate, the $293 billion number becomes much larger.) That means that every page I scan, out of the fifteen thousand or so, produces about $19.5 million of value for the world; that's about $9.8 billion an hour. My hourly wages have usually been less.
-
Categories
- *nix
- Academic
- Activity Updates
- Books
- Cinema
- Code
- Command Line
- Copyright
- Culture and Society
- Data Digging
- Economics
- EUPD
- External
- Filesharing
- Governance
- Hacks
- Happiness
- Hardware
- History
- Innovation and Intellectual Property
- Intellectual Myths
- Javascript
- Knowledge Systems
- Miscellaneous
- Musings
- Notes
- Open Bibliographic Data
- Open Data
- Open Knowledge Foundation
- Openness
- Own Work
- Papers
- People
- Photos
- Platforms
- Poetry
- Policy
- PSI
- Python
- Quote
- RDF
- Shuttleworth Fellow
- Software
- Sysadmin
- Talks
- Transaction Costs
- Work In Progress
-
Articles
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- March 2004
- October 2003
-
Meta




